[1] Trouble at the lab, The Economist, 23-27, Oct. 19th-25th, 2013.
[2] D. Sarewitz, Beware the creeping cracks of bias, Nature, 485, 149, 2012.
[3] J. P. A. Ioannidis, Why Most Published Research Findings Are False, Public Library of Science: Medicine, 8, 2005.
[4] J. P. Simmons, L. D. Nelson, U. Simonsohn, False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant, Psychological Science, 22, 1359-1366, 2011.
[5] C. M. Bennett, et al., Neural correlates of interspecies perspective taking in the post-mortem Atlantic Salmon: An argument for multiple comparisons correction, Human Brain Mapping Conference, San Francisco, Jun. 2009.
[6] J. P. A. Ioannidis, Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research, Journal of the American Medical Association, 294, 218-228, 2005.
[7] E. J. Masicampo, D. R. Lalande, A peculiar prevalence of p values just below .05, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2012.711335, 2012.
[8] C. Doucouliagos, T. D. Stanley, Are all economic facts greatly exaggerated? Theory competition and selectivity, Journal of Economic Surveys, 27, 316-339, 2013.
[9] A. Gerber, N. Malhotra, Do statistical reporting standards affect what is published? Publication bias in two leading political science journals, Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 3, 313-326, 2008.
[10] J. M. Dickson, S. Padmawar, S. Hammer, Joined at the hip: ETF and index development, Vanguard research, 2012.
[11] Winton Research, The Hypothetical Performance of CTAs, 2013.
[12] C. Chambers et al., Trust in science would be improved by study pre-registration, The Guardian, Letters, Jun. 5, 2013.
[13] E. J. Wagenmakers et al., An agenda for purely confirmatory research, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 632-638, 2012.
[14] E. F. Fama, K. R. French, Luck Versus Skill in the Cross Section of Mutual Fund Returns, Journal of Finance, 5, 1915-1947, 2010.